Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe
  • contracts
  • Copyright
  • E-commerce
  • hosting liability
  • Piracy
  • Presentations
  • SAP v Diageo
  • Trade Marks

The year in review: developments in computer, internet and e-commerce law (2016-2017)

  • June 13, 2017
  • Barry Sookman
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

I gave my annual presentation today to the Toronto computer Lawyers’ Group on “The year in review in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law”. It covered the period from June 2016 to June 2017. The developments included cases from Canada, the U.S. the U.K., and other EU and Commonwealth countries.

The developments were organized into the broad topics of: Online Liability/Intermediary Remedies, Copyright, Trade-marks/Domain Names, Technology Contracting, e-Commerce & Online Agreements, and Canada’s (despised) anti-spam/malware law, CASL

The cases referred to are listed below. My slides can be viewed after the case listing. These and many other cases will be added to my 7 volume book on Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (1988-2016).

Online Liability/Intermediary Remedies

  • Equustek Solutions Inc v Google Inc,  [2015] SCCA No 355
  • T. v. Globe24h.com, 2017 FC 114
  • Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 658 (06 July 2016)
  • The Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors [2017] EWHC 480 (Ch) (13 March 2017)
  • PJS v. News Group Newspapers [2016] UKSC 26
  • APC v. Orange SA (Paris C.A.), Decision of March 16, 2016
  • Universal Music Australia Pty Limited v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 435 (28 April 2017)
  • Hermes v. Doe, (SDNY April 30, 2012)
  • Chanel Inc. v. Does (D. Nev., Nov. 14, 2011)
  • ABS-CBN Corporation v Ashby, Case (Dist. Or. Aug. 8, 2014)
  • Richemont International SA v Chen, Case (SDNY Jan. 4, 2013)
  • ABS-CBN Corporation v Cinesilip.net 2017 WL 1628900 (S.D.Fla. May 1, 2017)
  • Hassell v. Bird, 247 Cal. App. 4th 1336
  • Arista Records LLC v. Tkach, 122 F.Supp.3d 32 (SDNY) 2015)
  • CG v Facebook Ireland Ltd & Anor [2016] NICA 54 (21 December 2016)
  • AY, Facebook (Ireland) Ltd & Ors [2016] NIQB 76 (9 September 2016)
  • Muwema v Facebook Ireland Ltd [2016] IEHC 519
  • Voltage Pictures, LLC v Joe Doe #1 2017 FCA 97

Copyright

  • Nintendo of America Inc. v. King, 2017 FC 246
  • Bell Canada v ITVBOX.NET2016 FC 612
  • Wesley dba MTLFREETV.com v Bell Canada et al 2017 FCA 55
  • Filmspeler, ECLI:EU:C:2017:300, 26 April, 2017
  • Trader v CarGurus, 2017 ONSC1841
  • 2251723 Ontario Inc. v Bell Canada, 2016 ONSC 7273
  • GS Media, C‑160/15, EU:C:2016:644
  • Mackie v Maxi Construction Ltd [2017]Scot 11 (7 Mar. 2017)
  • Geophysical Service Incorporated v EnCana Corporation, 2017 ABCA 125

Trade-marks/Domain Names

  •  Vancouver Community College v. Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc., 2017 BCCA 41
  • Argos Limited v Argos Systems Inc. [2017] EWHC 231 (ch)

Technology Contracting

  • Business Development Bank of Canada v Experian Canada Inc, 2017 ONSC 1851
  • SAP UK Ltd v Diageo Great Britain Ltd [2017] EWHC 189 (TCC) (16 February 2017)
  • Barry Sookman SAP wins major lawsuit based on indirect use and named user license terms: SAP v Diageo
  • Atos v Sapient, 2016 ONSC 6852
  • C&S Associates UK Ltd v Enterprise Insurance Company Plc [2015] EWHC 3757
  • Tremblay-Lavigne et al. v. Five Star Innovactions Inc, 2016 BCPC 453
  • Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc. v Metrolinx, 2017 ONSC 2372
  • Artifex Software Inc v Hancom, Inc 16-cv-06982-JSC (N.D.ca. Apr.25, 2017)
  • Composite Technologies Inc. v. Shawcor Ltd., 2017 ABCA 160
  • Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd v Au Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 172 (9 December 2016)
  • The Software Incubator Ltd v Computer Associates UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1587 (QB) (01 July 2016)
  • Bennett v Lenovo, 2017 ONSC 1082

e-Commerce & Online Agreements

  •  Selden v Airbnb, Inc 2016 WL 6476934 (D.Co. Nov. 1, 2016)
  • 1395804 Ontario Ltd. (Blacklock’s Reporter) v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FC 1255
  • Barry Sookman Browsewraps, fair dealing and Blacklock’s Reporter v Canada: a critical commentary
  • com, Inc v Mccants 210 So.3d 761 (CA.Fla.2017)
  • Hite v Lush Internet Inc. 2017 WL 1080906 (D.NJ. Mar 21, 2017)
  • Peng v Uber Technologies, Inc 2017 WL 722007 E.D.N.Y. Feb 23, 2017)
  • ADP, LLC v. Lynch, Court of Appeals 2017 WL 496089 (3rd.Cir. Feb. 7, 2017)
  • Devries v Experian Information Solutions, Inc 2017 WL 733096 (N.D.Cal. Feb 24, 2017)
  • Salameno v Gogo Inc 2016 WL 4005783 (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 25, 2016), motion for reconsideration denied 2016 WL 4939345 (Sept, 13, 2016)
  • Meyer v Kalanick 200 F.Supp.3d. 408 (S.D.N.Y.2016)
  • Nicosia v. Amazon. com, Inc., 834 F. 3d 220 (2nd.Cir.2016)
  • Norcia v Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 845 F.3d 1279 (9th.Cir.2017)
  • McMillan v Chaker 2017 WL 1336941 (S.D.Cal. Feb. 17, 2017)
  • Bazemore v Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC 827 F.3d 1325 (11th.Cir.2016)
  • Drozdowski v Citibank, Inc 2016 WL 4544543 (W.D.Tenn. Aug 31, 2016)
  • Parm v Bluestem Brands 2017 WL 1193993 (D.Minn. Mar. 30, 2017)
  • Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc. 840 F.3d 1016 (9th.Cir.2016)
  • Ingalls v Spotify USA, Inc 2016 WL 6679561 (N.D.Cal. Nov. 14, 2016)
  • Quilichini v Wilson’s Greenhouse, 2017 SKQB 10
  • Beau Briones v. Fitness International, LLC No. SACV 16-44-JLS (KESx) (C.D.Cal. Aug. 5, 2016)
  • James v. Global TelLink Corp 2017 WL 1160893 (3rd.Cir. Mar. 29, 2017)
  • Du v Jameson Bank, 2017 ONSC 2422
  • Harleysville Insurance Company v Holding Funeral Home, Inc Case No. 1:15cv00057 (W.D. Vir. Feb. 9, 2017)
  • Narusis v Bullion management Group Inc. 2016 ONSC 4731
  • MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v Glencore International AG [2017] EWCA Civ 365 (24 May 2017)

CASL

  • Plentyoffish, Mar. 2015,. CRTC
  • Porter June, 2015, CRTC
  • Rogers Media 2015, CRTC
  • Kellogg 2016, CRTC
  • Notice of Violation: Compu-Finder 2015
  • Blackstone Learning Corp. Compliance and Enforcement Decision CRTC 2016-428, Oct. 26, 2016
  • William Rapanos, Compliance and Enforcement Decision CRTC 2017-65, March 9, 2017
  • Bejim v Law Society of BC 2015 BCSC 169

My “Year in review” presentations to the Toronto Computer Lawyers Group for prior years are also available at my site. My slides from the 2015-2016 year in review talk can be found here. My slides from earlier today can be accessed below.

Sookman_TCLG_2017_year_in_review

Related

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
Related Topics
  • computer/internet law year in review 2016-2017
  • copyright law
  • e-commerce law
  • internet law
Previous Article
  • blocking orders
  • usage based software licenses

Equustek decision to be released soon by Supreme Court of Canada

  • June 12, 2017
  • Barry Sookman
View Post
Next Article
  • blocking orders
  • internet jurisdiction
  • ISP Liability

Google v Equustek: worldwide de-indexing order against Google upheld by Supreme Court

  • June 28, 2017
  • Barry Sookman
View Post

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

You May Also Like
Open AI motion to dismiss
View Post
  • artificial inteliigence
  • Copyright

OpenAI comes out swinging in motions to dismiss copyright class action claims

  • Barry Sookman
  • September 25, 2023
IPO Boston 2023
View Post
  • AI
  • Copyright

Generative AI and copyrights: My talk to the IPO

  • Barry Sookman
  • September 17, 2023
Copyright and GenAI
View Post
  • AI Regulation
  • artificial inteliigence
  • Copyright

Copyright does not protect content produced by Generative AI (GenAI): Thaler v Perlmutter

  • Barry Sookman
  • August 19, 2023
Bitcoin File Format protected by copyrght
View Post
  • Copyright

Copyright may subsist in Bitcoin file format: Wright v BTC Core

  • Barry Sookman
  • August 10, 2023

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.