Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe

Three Strikes

26 posts
  • Copyright
  • HADOPI
  • Three Strikes

Robert Levine and Brett Danaher at CMW

  • April 1, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

Last week, Robert Levine, author of Free Ride: How Digital Parasites are Destroying the Culture Business, and How the Culture Business Can Fight Back, and Brett Danaher, the author of a study on the effect of France’s HADOPI graduated response law, participated in several events in Toronto. This included talks by Robert Levine at the Economic Club, at Osoode Hall Law School, and at Canadian Music Week and by Brett Danaher at Osgoode Hall law School and Canadian Music Week.…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Fair Dealing
  • Fair Use
  • Geist
  • Graduated Response
  • ISP exceptions
  • ISP Liability
  • Piracy
  • statutory damages
  • Three Strikes
  • TPMs
  • WIPO Treaties

Some observations on Bill C-11: The Copyright Modernization Act

  • October 3, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Last Thursday the Government of Canada introduced into the House of Commons Bill C-11, an Act to Amend the Copyright Act. In a press release describing the Bill, Heritage Minister James Moore and Industry Minister Christian Paradis, stated that the Bill will ensure that Canada’s copyright laws “are modern, flexible, and in line with current international standards” and will “protect and help create jobs, promote innovation, and attract new investment to Canada.”

In the press conference announcing the Bill at the Ottawa office of software producer bitHeads Inc.,…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • notice and notice
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes

UK moving ahead with graduated response after Hargreaves Review of IP

  • August 10, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Last week, the UK government confirmed its intention to implement the graduated response process set out in the UK Digital Economy Act 2010 (DEA). Several documents released along with the response to Professor Hargreaves’ Review of Intellectual Property and Growth summarized the UK process and compared it with the graduated response processes enacted in France and New Zealand. See, Draft-Sharing-of-Costs statutory-instrument, Impact Assessment for the Sharing of Costs Statutory Instrument, and Digital Economy Act Appeals Process: Options for reducing costs.…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Graduated Response
  • notice and notice
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes

UK proposals to modernize UK Copyright Act released

  • August 3, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

The UK Government outlined plans earlier today to support economic growth by modernising the UK’s intellectual property laws. The Government accepted a number of recommendations made by Professor Ian Hargreaves in his report, Digital Opportunity: A review of intellectual property and growth in its response to Professor Hargreaves’ Review of Intellectual Property and Growth. The Government’s response can be found online at www.ipo.gov.uk/ipresponse.

The UK Government also simultaneously published a series of  other reports including: Next steps for implementation of the Digital Economy Act, “Site blocking” to reduce online copyright infringement, Draft-Sharing-of-Costs statutory-instrument, Impact Assessment for the Sharing of Costs Statutory Instrument, Digital Economy Act Appeals Process: Options for reducing costs, International Strategy, and IP Crime Strategy.…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Free Speech
  • human rights
  • ISP Liability
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes

UN report on internet disconnection flawed and contrary to jurisprudence

  • June 13, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Recently, the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom  of opinion and expression released a controversial report in which he stated he was

“alarmed by proposals to disconnect users from Internet  access if they violate intellectual property rights. This also includes legislation based on the  concept of “graduated response”, which imposes a series of penalties on copyright  infringers that could lead to suspension of Internet service, such as the so-called “three strikes-law” in France  and the Digital Economy Act 2010 of the United Kingdom.”

…
View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes

YouTube adopts “copyright school” to stop copyright infringement

  • April 14, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

YouTube has changed its copyright policy.  YouTube already has a policy that involves suspending accounts of YouTube users who have three copyright strikes. Now, if YouTube receives a notification that a user’s video is infringing the user will be required to go to  “YouTube Copyright School”.  A second change in the policy relaxes YouTube’s copyright strikes from a user’s accounts if the user completes the YouTube Copyright School and has demonstrated good behavior over time.

The Official YouTube Blog says the following:

If we receive a copyright notification for one of your videos, you’ll now be required to attend “YouTube Copyright School,” which involves watching a copyright tutorial and passing a quiz to show that you’ve paid attention and understood the content before uploading more content to YouTube.

…
View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • notice and notice
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes

New Zealand passes law to reduce online file sharing

  • April 14, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

New Zealand just enacted legislation that puts in place a three-notice regime to deter illegal file sharing.

The three-notice regime involves ISPs sending warning notices to their customers informing them they may have infringed copyright. The legislation extends the jurisdiction of the NZ Copyright Tribunal to provide an efficient, low-cost process to hear illegal file-sharing claims. The tribunal will be able to make awards of up to $15,000 based on damage sustained by the copyright owner.

The bill includes a power for a district court to suspend an internet account for up to six months, in appropriate circumstances.…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • ISP Liability
  • notice and notice
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes

Rethinking notice and notice after C-32 (now C-11)

  • April 4, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Canada’s last three copyright bills, C-60, C-61 and C-32, attempted to curb illegal online file sharing by requiring ISPs to forward notices of claimed infringements to customers. Canada’s ISPs had advocated for this “notice and notice” process claiming it was effective. However, they never produced any empirical evidence or studies to back up their claims.

On March 22, 2010 – before the federal election was called- TELUS, Bell and Rogers appeared before the Special Legislative Committee studying Bill C-32. The ISPs continued to endorse notice and notice asking that this process be formalized in C-32.…

View Post
Share
  • authorization
  • c-32
  • communication to the public
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Geist
  • Graduated Response
  • Piracy
  • Three Strikes
  • WIPO Treaties

iiNet court backs reasonableness of graduated response to stop illegal file sharing

  • March 8, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Last week the Australian Full Court released its decision in the landmark case Roadshow Films Pty Limited v iiNet Limited, [2011] FCAFC 23. The Australian appeals court by majority dismissed the appeal from the decision of the primary judge who had held that iiNet, an ISP in Australia that had not acted on any information provided to it by copyright owners, was not liable for authorizing the copyright infringement of its subscribers who had used its facilities to engage in unlicensed peer to peer file sharing.…

View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Piracy
  • Privacy
  • Three Strikes

EMI Records v UPC – the case for legislative solutions to illegal file sharing

  • October 11, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

Earlier today, the Irish High Court released its decision on whether it would grant an injunction against an ISP (in this case UPC) requiring it to implement a graduated response solution to reduce unauthorized file sharing of music. After reviewing a large amount of evidence and hearing from experts, the Court ruled that this type of order would be just and proportionate. However, it ruled that it lacked the jurisdiction to make such an order.

Here are some of the important findings made by Justice Charleton, the same judge who presided over the EMI Records & Ors -v- Eircom Ltd, [2010] IEHC 108 case :

  • The business of the recording industry is “being devastated by internet piracy”.
…
View Post
Share

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.