Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe

Piracy

107 posts
  • ACTA
  • c-32
  • copyright reform
  • Counterfeiting
  • Criminal Law
  • intellectual property
  • Piracy
  • Trade Marks
  • WIPO Treaties

RCMP report details Canada’s serious counterfeiting and piracy problems

  • September 17, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

The RCMP just published a report surveying the problems posed by counterfeiting and piracy in Canada. Some of the important findings of the report A National Intellectual Property Crime Threat Assessment, 2005 to 2008 are the following:

  • Traditionally viewed as being victimless, Intellectual Property (IP) crime has become a source of health and safety concern in Canada. Health, safety, and economic damages from the consumption and usage of counterfeit goods are being reported on an international scale. Victims of IP crime include, among others, people suffering from life threatening diseases who unknowingly use counterfeit medicines containing little or too many active ingredients, or toxins.
…
View Post
Share
  • ACTA
  • Counterfeiting
  • Free Speech
  • human rights
  • intellectual property
  • Piracy

Geist: tough IP laws suppress political dissent

  • September 15, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

In a blog post yesterday, How IP Enforcement Can Be Used To Suppress Dissent, Prof. Geist argues that “tougher enforcement measures” of IP laws are connected with civil rights abuses by governments to quell political dissent. He further claims that the USTR Special 301 report was connected to the recent Russian raids against advocacy groups and news organizations in Russia. He also postulates that enforcement of IP rights under ACTA would increase such abuses and accordingly would be “a dangerous and misguided approach that is apt to cause more problems than it solves”.…

View Post
Share
  • ACTA
  • Copyright
  • Piracy
  • TPMs

ACTA progress announced with plans to release final draft in September

  • August 23, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released a Statement on the recent ACTA negotiations.The Statement followed the conclusion of the 10th round of negotiations on the ACTA held in Washington, D.C. from 16 – 20 August 2010.

The Statement reported on the progress of the talks which are slated to conclude following meetings in Japan this September. It also served to allay fears about the proposed contents of the treaty by again re-affirming what the treaty will not extend to.…

View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • Piracy

Study shows 97% of torrents relate to infringing copyright content

  • July 23, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

A study by the Internet Commerce Security Laboratory  (ICSL) has found that over 97% of .torrent files that relate to copyright works shared over BitTorrent networks relate to infringing content.

The ICSL found that 0.3% of the files sampled were confirmed as being non-infringing (True Negatives); 89% were confirmed as being infringing (True Positives); 1.6% were ambiguous where they could not determine if they were infringing or not, and .91% related to pornographic torrents. Of the torrents in the top three categories (Movies, Music and TV shows), there were no legal torrents in the sample.…

View Post
Share
  • ACTA
  • Copyright
  • Counterfeiting
  • Piracy

ACTA will not create new IPRs or interfere with fundamental liberties statement says

  • July 4, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released a statement concerning the recent round of the ACTA negotiations in Lucerne, Switzerland. The release included he following that outlines some of the proposed limitations to the treaty:

“Participants stressed the importance of ACTA as an agreement that will establish an international framework for their efforts to more effectively combat the proliferation of counterfeiting and piracy, which undermines legitimate trade and the sustainable development of the world economy.

While ACTA aims at establishing effective enforcement standards for existing intellectual property rights, it is not intended to include new intellectual property rights or to enlarge or diminish existing intellectual property rights.

…
View Post
Share
  • ACTA
  • c-32
  • copyright reform
  • Piracy
  • TPMs
  • WIPO Treaties

Minister Moore’s Speech on C-32

  • June 23, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

Heritage Minister Moore gave a speech yesterday at a meeting of the The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). His focus was on Bill c-32, the Copyright Modernization Act. He made a number of important remarks about the goals behind the Bill. He also used the occasion to comment on some of the Bill’s main critics Here are some highlights of his speech.

Minister Moore stressed the contribution that the copyright industries make to Canada’s economy noting that they “cannot be underestimated, both in terms of stimulating investment and creating jobs”.…

View Post
Share
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • intellectual property
  • Piracy
  • TPMs
  • WIPO Treaties

Legends and reality about the 1996 WIPO Treaties in the light of certain comments on Bill C-32

  • June 17, 2010
  • Dr. Mihály Ficsor

I.  INTRODUCTION

It was at a copyright seminar abroad that I learned about the publication of Bill C-32 by which the Canadian government intends to adapt the copyright legislation to the digital on-line environment. By the time I arrived home, some of my European colleagues, with whom we usually exchange information, had sent me the links to various blog posts that were trying to offer a first assessment of the new Bill. Some of them contained objective analysis pointing out both the commendable elements of the draft provisions and those where further improvements were found desirable, while others seemed to reflect continued opposition to the government’s intention to modernize the copyright norms the way required by the international treaties and the emerging international standards.…

View Post
Share
  • ACTA
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Counterfeiting
  • Piracy
  • WIPO Treaties

Future of Music Coalition Panel: DC Policy Day 2010 – Focus on ACTA

  • May 27, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

…

View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • Criminal Law
  • data protection
  • E-commerce
  • Fair Dealing
  • Fair Use
  • Fundamental breach
  • Google Book Scanning
  • Graduated Response
  • human rights
  • intellectual property
  • ISP Liability
  • IT Contracts
  • Limitations of liability
  • Patents
  • Piracy
  • Presentations
  • Privacy
  • Trade Marks

Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2009-2010)

  • May 26, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

Here are the slides used in my presentation to the Toronto Computer Lawyers Group earlier today,  The Year in Review: Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2009-2010). It covers significant developements since my talk last spring.

The slides include a summary of the following cases and statutory references:

Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2010 SCC 4

Internet Broadcasting Corporation Ltd. v Mar LLC [2009] EWHC 844 (Ch)

Gammasonics Institute for Medical Research Pty Ltd v Comrad Medical Sysytems Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 267 (9 April 2010)

Kingsway Hall Hotel Ltd.…

View Post
Share
  • Copyright
  • Piracy

Isohunt permanently enjoined by US court

  • May 21, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

Yesterday, District Court Judge Stephen Wilson issued an order permanently enjoining Ishount and Gary Fung from continuing to engage in copyright infringement. The Court found an injunction necessary because the plaintiffs “have demonstrated that they have suffered irreparable harm, and would suffer further irreparable harm from Defendants’ continued infringement”.

According to the Court, “Plaintiffs’ power to control their rights has been so compromised by the means through which [Defendants] encouraged end users to infringe (digital files plus the internet) that the inducement amounts to irreparable harm.”…

View Post
Share

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 11 Next

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.