Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe

hyperlinking liability

6 posts
  • CASL
  • click wrap agreement
  • Computer & Internet Law Update
  • conflicts of laws
  • Copyright
  • data protection
  • E-commerce
  • hyperlinking liability
  • Internet defamation
  • internet jurisdiction
  • ISP Liability
  • IT Contracts
  • jurisdiction
  • Limitations of liability
  • making available right
  • Piracy
  • Presentations
  • web wrap agreement

Developments in computer, Internet and e-commerce law: the year in review (2017-2018)

  • June 14, 2018
  • Barry Sookman

I gave my annual presentation today to the Toronto computer Lawyers’ Group on “The year in review in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law”. It covers the period from June 2017 to June 2018. The developments include cases from Canada, the U.S. the U.K., Singapore, Australia, and other countries.

The developments are organized into the broad topics of:

  • Jurisdiction/Online Remedies/Conflicts of Laws
  • Hyperlinks/Search Results/Computer Generated Content
  • e-Commerce & Online Agreements
  • Technology Contracting
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • CASL.

The cases referred to are listed below.…

View Post
Share
  • defamation
  • hyperlinking liability

Is Google a publisher according to Google? The Google v Equustek and Duffy cases

  • October 10, 2017
  • Barry Sookman

Is Google, the operator of the world’s most popular search engine, a publisher entitled to the constitutional protections accorded to publishers of free speech? Or is Google a passive/neutral intermediary which has no control over what its search engine algorithms disseminate and which doesn’t publish the information in, or hyperlinked to, it’s search results? Google argues it is and is not a publisher, depending on which position will best exonerate it from legal demands including court orders that it de-index URLs and websites from which illegal content is made available.…

View Post
Share
  • communication to the public
  • contributory infringement
  • Copyright
  • hosting liability
  • hyperlinking liability
  • infringment
  • ISP Liability
  • making available right
  • public perofmance
  • WIPO Treaties

Understanding Flava Works v myVidster: does inline linking infringe copyright?

  • August 8, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

Last week, the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion in the  Flava Works, Inc, v Gunter dba myVidster 2012 WL 3124826 (7th.Cir. Aug 2, 2012) case. The central issue was whether Flava Works, the owner of copyrights in videos, was entitled to a preliminary injunction against the social video bookmarking service myVidster. The injunction which had been granted by the District Court was vacated.

Some commentators have construed the decision as a ruling that embedding or inline linking to a copyright-infringing video on another web site does not infringe copyright[1].…

View Post
Share
  • APIs
  • authorization
  • C-11
  • CASL
  • click wrap agreement
  • Computer & Internet Law Update
  • conflicts of laws
  • contracts
  • contributory infringement
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • data protection
  • defamation
  • DMCA safe harbor
  • E-commerce
  • Google Book Scanning
  • hyperlinking liability
  • innocent disseminator
  • intellectual property
  • Internet defamation
  • ISP Liability
  • IT Contracts
  • jurisdiction
  • misleading advertising
  • OSFI Guidlines
  • Presentations
  • Privacy
  • Reproduction
  • shrink wrap license
  • spam
  • Trade Marks
  • web wrap agreement

Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2011-2012)

  • June 21, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

Here are the slides used in my presentation to the Toronto Computer Lawyers Group earlier today, The Year in Review: Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2011-2012). It covers significant developements since my talk last spring, Developments in Computer, Internet and E-Commerce Law (2010-2011).

The slides include a summary of the following cases:

Kraft Real Estate Investments, LLC v Homeway.com, Inc. 2012 WL 220271 (D.S.Car. Jan 24, 2012)

Swift v. Zynga Game Network, Inc., 805 F.Supp.2d…

View Post
Share
  • authorization
  • C-11
  • communication to the public
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • Counterfeiting
  • cyberlockers
  • Fair Dealing
  • Fair Use
  • Google Book Scanning
  • human rights
  • hyperlinking liability
  • infringment
  • Internet defamation
  • jurisdiction
  • Piracy
  • Presentations
  • Reproduction
  • statutory damages
  • storage lockers

Copyright law 2011 –the year in review in Canada and around the world

  • January 13, 2012
  • Barry Sookman

Yesterday, I gave a talk at the Law Society of Upper Canada’s 16th Annual Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review program. My talk canvassed developments in copyright in 2011.  My slides are shown below. The associated paper prepared in collaboration with Glen Bloom, with the help of others, is available here.

My slides and/or the paper summarize the following copyright cases from Canada, the USA, UK and  Europe:

CANADA

Re: Sound v Motion Picture Theatre Association of Canada 2011 FCA 70

Reference re Broadcasting Act 2011 FCA 64

Crookes v. …

View Post
Share
  • authorization
  • C-11
  • Copyright
  • copyright reform
  • hyperlinking liability
  • Piracy

Hyperlinking and ISP liability clarified by Supreme Court in Crookes case

  • October 20, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

The Supreme Court released its reasons in Crookes v. Newton 2011 SCC 47 yesterday. The legal issue in the appeal was whether hyperlinks that connect to allegedly defamatory material can be said to “publish” that material. The majority of the Court concluded that a hyperlink, by itself, should never be seen as “publication” of the content to which it refers. Although the case dealt mainly with that issue the Court gave expansive reasons which will have significant impacts on future cases involving Internet defamation, freedom of expression on the Internet, and the liability of ISPs for dissemination of defamatory or infringing content.…

View Post
Share

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.