Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe
  • blocking orders
  • Copyright
  • Uncategorized

Equustek v Google: my Fordham talk

  • April 22, 2017
  • Barry Sookman
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Fordham Law School has the best annual  intellectual property conferences. I had the privilege of speaking at its 25th Annual IP Conference yesterday on the Equustek v Google case. In this case the Supreme Court of Canada is being asked to decide if Canadian courts have the jurisdiction to make global de-indexing orders against search engines like Google, and if so, the factors to be considered in making such orders. My slides from the talk are shown below.

What made my talk such a treat, was the presence of Mr Justice Arnold in the audience. Justice Arnold is a distinguished jurist from the English High Court and author of numerous copyright and other intellectual property decisions. In particular, he decided  Cartier International AG v. British Sky Broadcasting Limited, [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch.), a case which confirmed the equitable jurisdiction to make blocking orders against internet intermediaries. This decision was relied upon by the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Google, 2015 BCCA 265 in affirming the de-indexing order made by Chambers judge Fenlon in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. Jack, 2014 BCSC 1063. This could only happen at Fordham’s annual conference.

Sookman_Fordham_Equustek v Google

 

Related

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
Related Topics
  • de-indexing orders
  • Google v Equustek
  • search engines

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

You May Also Like
Barry Sookman Copyright Lawyer
View Post
  • communication to the public
  • Copyright

Five Tech Cases Everyone Needs to Know – SOCAN v CAIP

  • Barry Sookman
  • October 25, 2023
All In AI Event Sookman Keynote speech
View Post
  • AI
  • AI Ethics
  • AI Regulation
  • artificial inteliigence
  • Copyright

AI, Copyright + the Wisdom of Experience: my keynote speech at All In

  • Barry Sookman
  • September 30, 2023
Voltage copyright infringement
View Post
  • Copyright
  • infringment

Internet account holders not liable for copyright infringement of their users: Voltage v Doe

  • Barry Sookman
  • September 28, 2023
Open AI motion to dismiss
View Post
  • artificial inteliigence
  • Copyright

OpenAI comes out swinging in motions to dismiss copyright class action claims

  • Barry Sookman
  • September 25, 2023

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.