Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe
  • CASL

CASL gets Rogers Media

  • November 21, 2015
  • Barry Sookman
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

The CRTC announced yesterday that it bagged another CASL pelt – this time Rogers Media. The company agreed to an undertaking with the CRTC and to pay $200,000 to avoid expensive enforcement proceedings.

Rogers Media allegedly sent commercial emails (CEMs) containing an unsubscribe mechanism that did not function properly or which could not be readily performed by the recipient. In some instances, the electronic address used to unsubscribe was allegedly not valid for the required minimum of 60 days following the sent message. Rogers Media also allegedly failed to honour, within 10 business days, requests from some recipients to unsubscribe from receiving future commercial emails.

Should the public cheer this announcement along with the CRTC? No. CASL is an ill-conceived, indefensible law, that overly restricts commercial speech without justification.  See, Michael Geist’s defense of Canada’s indefensible anti-spam law CASL, and CASL: the unofficial FAQ, regulatory impact statement, and compliance guideline.

CASL has likely cost Canadians millions of dollars in compliance costs and miles of red tape. It is a drag on innovation and hurts the competitiveness of Canadian businesses, which alone among their foreign competitors have to comply with such significant barriers to commercial electronic commerce. It acts as an impediment to foreign investment in Canadian high paying technology jobs and has resulted in Canadian businesses moving IT operations out of the country.

Ultimately, it is also ordinary Canadian consumers who suffer because of CASL. They indirectly have to foot the hefty CASL compliance costs and disproportionate fines exacted by the CRTC. All of these costs get passed on to consumers as higher costs for goods and services. So when you get a price hike on your next purchases of media products from Rogers Media, thank CASL and the CRTC.

CASL should be repealed or significantly amended. Fixing CASL should be at the top of the new Government agenda of inherited laws that need fixing.

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
Related Topics
  • CASL
  • Rogers Media
Previous Article
  • defamation

Google liable for defamation through search and autocomplete features: Duffy v Google

  • November 5, 2015
  • Barry Sookman
View Post
Next Article
  • Copyright
  • Uncategorized

Technological neutrality, technological neutrality, technological neutrality: CBC v SODRAQ

  • November 27, 2015
  • Barry Sookman
View Post

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

You May Also Like
View Post
  • CASL

Supreme Court denies Compufinder leave to appeal in CASL Charter and constitutional challenge

  • Barry Sookman
  • March 4, 2021
Dynamic blocking order
View Post
  • CASL
  • Copyright
  • making available right

Court of Appeal rules CASL is constitutional and releases decision on the making available right

  • Barry Sookman
  • June 5, 2020
View Post
  • CASL
  • Charter of Rights

COVID-19 and Canada’s anti-spam law CASL

  • Barry Sookman
  • April 24, 2020
View Post
  • CASL
  • Uncategorized

CRTC’s troubling guidelines on CASL accessorial liability

  • Barry Sookman
  • November 7, 2018
8 comments
  1. David Collier-Brown says:
    November 21, 2015 at 8:25 pm

    As noted elsewhere, I find CASL trivial to obey (it took about 4-5 man-hours at work) and a valuable public policy initiative.

    We had to add a paragraph to our terms and conditions and issue an SQL command that said “update the ‘must agree to terms’ indicator to true wherever the person is from Canada”

    Feel free to write to me (davecb@spamcop.net) and ask for details: it’s legitimately harder for non-technical companies than it is for nerds.

  2. Barry Sookman says:
    November 21, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    I’ve been in countless meetings including, as it happens, one on Friday where businesses expressed how they loath CASL and just how wasteful difficult it is to comply with.

  3. David Collier-Brown says:
    November 22, 2015 at 9:13 am

    I’m sure companies will not wish to do so, but I also suspect that that their IT departments said something like “What, another program to write? I don’t want to do it, I don’t have any time, we don’t have the budget, it’s really really hard… what was it that it has to do again? Well, that’s *really really hard*.”

    –dave (:-)) c-b

  4. Barry Sookman says:
    November 23, 2015 at 7:19 pm

    David, it is far more onerous and time consuming. Its not whining for a little effort. Its shrieking because of the insanely stupid and wasteful effort it entails.

  5. David Collier-Brown says:
    November 23, 2015 at 8:17 pm

    Darn, I think we’ll have to disagree: your evidence points in the opposite direction of mine.

    –dave

  6. David Collier-Brown says:
    November 23, 2015 at 8:25 pm

    I posted a link to your article at Google+ with the description
    ‘To be fair, people strongly disagree re the desirability of CASL, with real, heartfelt concerns at the “insanely stupid and wasteful effort it entails”. (Courtesy of Barry Sookman)’

  7. Barry Sookman says:
    November 23, 2015 at 8:53 pm

    Thanks

  8. Pat Liebeck says:
    May 15, 2016 at 11:26 am

    I believe CASL is a plot on Canada Post’s behalf to force people/businesses back to using direct mail – which is too expensive and garners very little return. A simple unsubscribe button on any email should keep CASL happy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, and privacy Law

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.