Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.
Barry Sookman
Barry Sookman
  • Bio & expertise
    • Bio
    • Technology & Internet Lawyer
    • Copyright and Intellectual Property Lawyer and Litigator
    • Privacy & CASL
    • Government Relations
    • Rankings
  • Books & Articles
  • Speeches & Media
  • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
Subscribe

Reproduction

23 posts
  • authorization
  • communication to the public
  • Copyright
  • Fair Dealing
  • human rights
  • idea expression dichotomy
  • Presentations
  • Reproduction

Copyright law 2010 –the year in review in Canada and around the world

  • January 13, 2011
  • Barry Sookman

Here is a copy of the slides I used today at the Law Society of Upper Canada’s Intellectual Property Year in Review conference. The associated paper prepared in collaboration with Glen Bloom, and with the help of others, is available here.

My slides summarize the following copyright cases from Canada, Australia, UK, Ireland, Singapore, Europe and the USA:

Canada

Alberta (Education) v Access Copyright 2010 FCA 198

Bell Canada v SOCAN (Tariff 22) 2010 FCA 220

Canadian Private Copying Collective v.…

View Post
Share
  • authorization
  • Copyright
  • Reproduction

Federal Court of Appeal decides the Satellite Radio JRs

  • December 16, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

The Federal Court of Appeal released its reasons for decision in two judicial review applications from the Copyright Board’s decision released of April, 2009. Both JR applications were dismissed.

The decision contains several important copyright rulings. In particular:

  • When an entity provides a service for use with its own designed and manufactured devices e.g., a satellite radio service and radio receiving set, and the use of the device with the service will necessarily result in automatic copying of the content by the user, the provider of the service (in this case XM and Sirius), can  be liable for the copying which occurs on the device under a theory of authorization.
…
View Post
Share
  • broadcasting
  • c-32
  • Copyright
  • Reproduction

When do broadcasters reproduce works ? The Copyright Board clarifies the law in the Commercial Radio Tariff case

  • July 18, 2010
  • Barry Sookman

The Copyright Board released its reasons for decision in the Commercial Radio Tariff proceedings last week. The case involved many different parties and issues and resulted in the certification of a tariff that covers a gamut of music uses by broadcasters in the course of their operations.

In the course of giving reasons for its decision, the Board made a number of important statements about what constitutes a reproduction for the purposes of the Copyright Act. In particular, the Board canvassed the activities of broadcasters and examined which activities resulted in reproductions of musical works (and sound recordings) in the course of their broadcasting operations.…

View Post
Share

Posts pagination

Previous 1 2 3

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Barry Sookman
This site is about technology, copyright, artificial intelligence, and privacy law.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

We may be using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Barry Sookman
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website may use cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.